We’ve noticed you’re visiting from NZ. Click here to visit our NZS site.
We’ve noticed you’re visiting from NZ. Click here to visit our NZS site.
You have agreed what your policy, programme or strategy will do – the next question is what to measure to show what it is achieving. We build the monitoring and evaluation framework that helps you answer that question. A theory of change and programme logic set out how the activities in your initiative lead to change over the short, medium and long term. Evaluation questions, indicators and data collection then measure how much change is taking place.
Once you have instituted a policy, programme or strategy, you need to know whether it is working. That means deciding what to measure, how often, and who collects the data. We build those measures with you, in a framework your own staff can keep running.
The first thing we build is the theory of change: how the activities in your policy, programme or strategy will lead to desired outcomes over time. The logic model then lays out that theory, connecting your initiative to its impacts over the short, medium and long term.
Following that we set evaluation questions, key performance indicators and data collection points, and plan for who collects what and when. If the framework will sit inside a strategy you are still writing, learn more about our strategic planning here.
Shape the plan around the community's own values. For the Kiribati Federation of Aotearoa we co-designed an evaluation plan around the Kiribati concept of maroro (discussion), and made sure to centre cultural values. The maroro approach gives community members a way to share their experiences and say what success looks like. With the plan, the Federation could run its own evaluation and show its funders structured, objective measures.
Include the people and external influences around the initiative. A logic drawn as one line from activities to outcomes leaves out people with a stake in the initiative, the tensions between them and the conditions nobody controls. We list who is involved and what each of them cares about, then set out the tensions between them.
Test whether the outcomes reach the people you designed the initiative for. Outcomes change in quantity and quality over time, and the people who benefit most can be those the initiative was not initially designed for. We write the groups the initiative serves into the framework, so the indicators show whether outcomes are shared equally.
Decide on indicators that stay useful. An indicator shows movement towards an outcome, and it is not the outcome itself. Once an indicator becomes a target, it stops being useful, because it no longer shows whether the outcome has changed. So, we keep the set of indicators small, and we flag any indicator that could stop reflecting its outcome as circumstances change.
Your staff will run the framework once it is built, so they help us write it. The stages below end with an implementation plan that names who collects each measure and when, not with findings about your initiative.
What we deliver:
We go through what your policy, programme or strategy sets out to do with you, and learn who receives reports on its progress. We also find out how much time your staff have to collect data. If you have no theory of change, or your objectives are unclear, we develop one with you before we set any questions. If you already have one, or a logic model, we build the framework on what you have.
We read your strategy, plans and existing reporting, then design the workshops and validation points – who takes part, and what each session has to produce. If you also need a dollar value on the outcomes, the theory of change we build with you is where a social return on investment analysis begins. Learn more about our social return on investment work here.
We co-develop the programme logic and the evaluation questions in workshops with the people who will run the framework. Then we build the key performance indicators, the data collection tools and the implementation plan. Alongside this we build your team's skills in evaluation, so your staff can run the framework without us. If the workshops need to reach beyond your own staff – to a community or a sector – learn more about our stakeholder engagement here.
We bring the draft framework to sense-making sessions with you, and revise it from what you tell us before it is final. We also check that each indicator has a data source and each collection task an owner. If the initiative involves communities or stakeholders beyond your organisation, they take part in validation workshops too.
You receive the framework, the tools and the implementation plan, and your team starts collecting against the plan it helped write.
Yes, one programme logic can show each group's starting point as a separate path inside a single model. We work with you to identify the three or four main groups your initiative serves, and what each one needs. We draw a path from activities to outcomes for each group, then combine the paths into a single overall logic. The outcomes can differ by group too: one group may aim to become more independent over time, and another to keep its independence for as long as possible.
You do not need a separate framework for each sector. The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment had plans across eight industries, each with its own vision and initiatives and each at a different stage. The one framework we built for all eight showed the Ministry the trends across the programme as well as insights into each industry.
An evaluation plan sets out the questions the evaluation has to answer, a logic model of how the programme works, the data collection tools and the evaluation's phases. The phases can run from design through data collection and analysis to reporting. The plan also sets the points at which you check findings with the people concerned.
Clarify in the terms of reference what is fixed, what is contested and what you could realistically change, and say why you want an outside view. Inside those parameters, findings follow the evidence: we report what evidence supports, whether or not that is what you expected. Once you have agreed the scope, let the reviewer work, because a review you intervene in is no longer the independent view you paid for. It adds as little as possible, because we size the framework to the data your team can collect. A few measures collected well tell you more than many collected poorly. For Tūao Aotearoa - Volunteering New Zealand, we set clear criteria and indicators to guide data collection without overburdening programme participants.