We’ve noticed you’re visiting from NZ. Click here to visit our NZS site.
We’ve noticed you’re visiting from NZ. Click here to visit our NZS site.
We transform complex policy challenges into practical solutions that work. We help you understand what you’re trying to achieve and develop the right policy approach to get there.
Our approach combines rigorous analysis, with practical implementation knowledge ensuring you see beyond theory to what works in practice.
We support clients from the beginning to end of policy development – from defining problems and conducting literature reviews, to evaluating options and implementing change. We make it easy for you to find a way forward by offering recommendations backed by public engagement and thematic analysis. We draft key documentation (e.g. Cabinet papers) and provide supporting research, cost-benefit analysis, regulatory impact analysis, stakeholder engagement, and peer-review processes.
Cost-benefit analysis - evaluating the social, economic, and other impacts using quantitative and qualitative research.
International research - analysing global trends using literature reviews and case study evidence that applies to New Zealand.
Guidance documents - developing hands-on plans to help you enact change.
We help you fulfil your regulatory stewardship obligations by evaluating your existing regulations against best practices and providing advice on future design. Our evidence-based approach ensures your regulatory systems remain effective, responsive and trusted by those they affect.
Ongoing monitoring, assessment and updates to regulations to ensure they remain fit for purpose.
We facilitate meaningful consultation processes that build legitimacy and improve compliance with regulatory requirements.
We identify emerging trends and potential disruptions to help you adapt to challenging regulatory needs.
Since 2023, the effectiveness of our public engagement means Allen + Clarke has analysed more than 735,000 policy submissions, including triaging over 300,000 submissions on New Zealand's 2025 Treaty Principles Bill. This approach to stakeholder engagement ensures clients get diverse input from subject matter experts, and interested or impacted groups.
Designing public engagement strategies - developing targeted consultation processes that ensure meaningful participation.
Leading stakeholder engagement - running structured interviews, focus groups, and surveys that capture varied perspectives.
Delivering thematic submissions analysis - providing recommendations to inform your decision-making.
We combine rigorous literature reviews with thematic analysis to develop scientific health policy standards. We've been able to give healthcare practitioners constructive guidelines across complex areas like maternity care and assisted dying.
Comparative guideline analysis - conducting structured reviews to establish best practices in health policy.
Evidence synthesis - analysing themes from peer-reviewed studies to ensure any guidelines and standards are backed by evidence.
Standards and guidelines development - collaborating with experts to translate evidence and knowledge into health policy.
We clarify objectives by challenging assumptions and gathering insights.
We craft a tailored roadmap to prevent future complications.
We execute with transparency while proactively addressing emerging challenges.
We validate recommendations through inclusive sensemaking sessions.
We reflect on learnings while recognising team accomplishments.
Our team have experience working on both politically and commercially sensitive issues. For any sensitive issue we ensure there are clear expectations up-front and robust risk management processes in place. Our team ensures there is balanced consideration of different viewpoints and options, and present findings and recommendations in a way that acknowledges the political realities while remaining evidence-based.
Our team have extensive experience with analysing submissions and practice with maintaining objectivity. Our submissions analysis process uses a structured analytical methodology, and we often incorporate multiple analysts or reviewers to provide quality assurance checks. Our approach aims to present the views of stakeholders independently, with any critical analysis or insight clearly delineated from stakeholder viewpoints.
Yes, our team have expertise in developing legally robust standards and guidelines. We work closely with your legal advisors to ensure that any standards or guidelines are practical and have the right balance of certainty and flexibility.
In emerging areas we develop theoretical frameworks, complete first principles analysis, and consider what evidence from similar or related fields or other jurisdictions may be able to tell us. We ensure that any solutions we design are flexible to adapt as evidence emerges or the situation changes.
We know that projects that span multiple government agencies have unique challenges. We help clients to navigate this complexity by identifying interdependencies, establishing joint working arrangements and ensuring consistent communications. We have specific experience facilitating collaborative policy development across agency boundaries.