We’ve noticed you’re visiting from NZ. Click here to visit our NZS site.
We’ve noticed you’re visiting from NZ. Click here to visit our NZS site.
The Health and Safety Association of New Zealand (HASANZ) turned to Allen + Clarke when they needed to evaluate their Applied Health and Safety Research Scholarship Programme. After running the programme as a pilot from 2018 to 2020 with five scholarship recipients, HASANZ needed clear evidence about its effectiveness in supporting recipients, industry engagement during research and whether the funded work improved health and safety outcomes. Without this evaluation, HASANZ would lack the information needed to strengthen the programme and demonstrate its value to stakeholders like ACC, who funded the scholarships.
HASANZ represents 14 health and safety and workforce development organisations across New Zealand. Established in 2013 following the Government's Working Safer reforms, HASANZ works to increase the professionalism of workplace health and safety practitioners. Their Applied Research Scholarship Programme, funded by ACC and awarded annually since 2018, aims to encourage further education in workplace health and safety and build sector capability.
Our team applied deep expertise in evaluation methodologies and knowledge of New Zealand's health and safety sector to design a practical approach. Our mixed-methods approach uncovered valuable insights that would have remained hidden without conducting a thorough evaluation:
Our evaluation revealed specific strengths and opportunities:
Recipients highly valued the generous financial assistance that enabled research that otherwise wouldn't proceed.
The scholarship effectively supported work addressing important knowledge gaps in workplace health and safety.
Mentorship was conceptually valuable but confusing in practice, with recipients unclear about available support.
Communication between HASANZ and recipients happened sporadically, creating uncertainty about expectations.
Industry connections were strong, but researchers needed more help communicating findings to relevant audiences.
Media meetings occurred too early in the research process, before meaningful results were available.
Get clarity on your challenge with our free one-hour discovery session - no obligation, just practical insights on how we can help.
Based on our findings, we recommended specific actions to enhance programme impact:
Develop a structured communications plan with regular checkpoints to maintain connection with recipients.
Revise the mentorship programme to provide a clear list of appropriate mentors with defined roles.
Leverage existing relationships to strengthen connections between researchers and key organisations.
Increase flexibility in funding allocation to better support longer-term research projects.
Schedule media and communications meetings at appropriate points in the research timeline.